Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Since Trinity indicated a preference for pink hair…
So Trin sent me a link to some lovely pics. I’m not sure if I’m allowed to re-post it here, but since she mentioned that pink hair is always a good thing…it so happens that I agree. My hair’s been several shades in the red/pink to purple continuum, actually, and I retain somewhat of a fetish for people with hair colors not found in nature. Anyway, here’s my personal favourite pink haired boy, although alas his hair is now back to its natural color…I miss the pink and purple hair. Mild bonus kinkiness included! Trin I think will appreciate the one where he’s wearing a leather collar and looking notably submissive. I especially love the outfit that gives him spiky silver boobs, the homoerotic pics with my beloved Toshiya, and the one where he has a drumstick in his mouth.
More serious stuff below, BTW.
































And now the real celebration begins…

The topic of rape has come up again a few times recently. Whenever this subject is raised there are always a few men who jump in with the following argument.

“But men just don’t understand you strange, complicated creatures! We’re stupid, and you must realize this. We can’t read body language. How are we supposed to know if a woman is consenting or not?”
Um, ask her? Is that really so difficult? Seriously, if there’s any confusion in your mind, if you’re not sure…just stop and ask!

Onto the next stupid argument….
“We can’t read body language”
I call bullshit. Let me repeat something I posted over at Ren’s place.

About body language...well, that depends on what kind of body language we're talking about. If a woman is actively trying to push the man away? Has her hands on his chest or torso pushing? Refuses to open her legs? That's some pretty clear body language. I don't think any man is really dumb enough to be unable to read that. Those who are applying "he didn't get it" arguments to that scenario...sorry, not buying it. Unless it's a specifically BSDM-themed encounter then those things unambiguously mean "stop, right now". If a women freezes up and turns away...again, I don't really think that's hard to read. A complete lack of enthusiasm on the other person's part is kind of hard to miss. Basically this is where I have a problem with teaching people "consent" as the benchmark. It positions the woman as passive, and normalizes that situation. It creates an expectation that any woman who isn't actively screaming and trying to run away is willing to have sex. That is not in fact the case. I think that the model we SHOULD be teaching young men hinges on ENTHUSIASTIC PARTICIPATION. The woman doesn't seem into it, isn't participating, is just lying there? Stop and find out if she's OK. Are you a rapist if you don't? The law would say no, but for me, I would want to know more but regardless of whether or not I called it rape in the end I would call the man a creepy bastard who I would not want to have sex with.Seriously...why would you even want to fuck someone who's lying there like a corpse, who doesn't seem into it? How uninterested in women's pleasure do you have to be to think that's an OK way for sex to look? To me that kind of looks like necrophilia, to be honest. Bottom line for me - if either partner seems withdrawn and not into things, the other should stop and check in, find out what's going on. If you have even the slightest hunch that something's not right, you have a moral responsibility to stop and check. If you choose not to do that? That's a choice. Pretending that you can't read body language because you're a man doesn't cut it. You're choosing not to care whether the other person is having a good time or not. Does that make you a rapist? In some cases yes, in others no. What it absolutely makes you is a selfish asshole.

Is that simple enough? Pretty unambiguous, right?

I’m not kidding about the “enthusiastic participation” thing. Why the hell does ANYONE want to fuck someone who isn’t enthusiastic? What’s wrong with you people? Are you all into necrophilia or something? Jeez, and I thought I was kinky…

I’ve always disliked the label sex positive. I associate it with a sort of goofy earnestness that sets my teeth on edge – I’m a POMO baby. I don’t do earnest (nods to Piny!). Think Annie Sprinkle and her mirror. Not for me. However…

The idea of consent, defined as the absence of struggle, as the benchmark for when sex should proceed? That’s about as sex-negative an idea as I can think of. It’s…dead. Profoundly depressing. Almost guaranteed to result in boring, unsatisfying sex. There will be no swinging from the chandeliers in that scenario, no ground-shaking orgasms, no moments where it all feels so good you’re barely aware of where the other person’s body ends and yours begins. No passion, no excitement. Nothing.

Why the hell did we EVER accept that as the benchmark? Do we really think that we can’t do any better? Is that really what we want to teach young men and women? Is that the expectation of how sex is supposed to feel that we want to set up for them?

I say no. We can do better. I say if there’s no raw passion, if nobody is screaming and out of their mind by the end, if both parties aren’t so horny they’re desperate for each other, they may as well not bother. People have hands, after all – if you’re going to fuck someone who’s not into it you may as well be masturbating. In fact you ARE masturbating, just with the aid of a living, breathing, but utterly non-participating toy/corpse.

Anyone here want to be a toy/corpse? I didn’t think so.

And guys? If that’s what you want…just jerk off. It’s about the same thing, and at least that way there’s less risk of someone else getting hurt. And of your ass getting thrown in jail.

Enthusiastic participation, people. Let’s shift the paradigm. It’s long past time.
See, I do like muscular men sometimes…well, there’s one.
And the next entry in the category of men upon whom Cassandra likes to gaze is…Pavel Bure. Russian ice hockey player. Very good hockey player, by the way. They called him the Russian Rocket for a reason. Fast, agile, great hands…have I mentioned how much I appreciate men with great hands? Chubbier in the face than I normally go for too. Now as I’ve mentioned normally I’m not so fond of muscular guys, and I loathe professional athletes, but this guy…so sexy. I’ve seen him in real life and he’s actually rather un-photogenic, as hard as that is to believe. How can you not love a man this pretty with abs you could bounce quarters off of? Not to mention the sheer agility…I can think of plenty of ways to put that kind of agility to good use.















Lust project, continued...
And today's sidebar babe is Kaoru! Say hello to Kaoru, everyone. He'll get his own post later.
Cassandra’s Lust Objects, continued…

There are so many to choose from, where to begin?
OK, that’s a stupid question. For me the answer is obvious.
Toshiya – Ah, Toshiya. Real name Hara Toshimasa. Bass player extrordinaire for Dir en grey (seriously, take a listen, he’s fucking awe inspiring). Six feet of sheer physical perfection. Known amongst fans of the Japanese rock/metal/indie/punk/all things alterna music scene as the Universal Lust Object. The stunning facial features, the cheeky grin, the gobsmackingly beautiful body (seriously, I had my hands on that chest and stomach a few weeks ago and DAMN). The pouty lips, the gorgeous collarbones, the ridiculously long legs. The ass…the tendency to turn his back to the audience, bend over and smack his own ass. The fact that he actually seems to LIKE being objectified by women. The fact that he actually seems to like women, period. The endless sexy photoshoots. The willingness to pose in compromising positions with other men to make the female fans happy. The habit of going shirtless on stage. The leather pants. His lovely habit, sadly not seen for the last couple of years, of molesting and licking his band-mates during shows. Simulating fellatio on his guitar player just to get a rise out of the (mostly female) crowd – thanks, babe, we appreciate it! The tiny little hips. The perfectly defined torso. The big, beautiful eyes.
He’s so stunning I can even forgive him for the fact that he used to make a prettier girl than me. I remember him when he first appeared as a skinny, goofy, thoroughly silly 19 year old boy…when did he get so manly? And yet somehow manage to keep the goofy charm and the tendency to randomly cuddle people without warning? How does he manage to interact with all those adoring teenage girls without either intimidating or leering at them? Everyone who meets the guys seems to walk away in a good mood, babbling about how sweet and friendly and unpretentious he was. How does he do that? Add in the fact that he’s so blunt you sometimes wonder if he has any filter at all…perfect, really.
And then there’s the way he grooves with that bass…
If one was to design a man exactly to Cassandra’s personal specifications he would look a lot like Toshiya. Alas, he has recently been wearing a wedding ring so he seems to be off the market, but a girl can dream, right?















































































Monday, March 19, 2007

About that whole celebration of female desire thing...

Let's start with the sidebar, shall we? Because I'm lazy, and I don't have another full post ready yet.
Now, as you may have surmised, the pictures on my sidebar are not pictures of me, what with them lacking breasts and all. They're usually pictures of men I find really, really hot. There are many reasons for this - first, since it's my blog I look at it fairly often, why not have something I enjoy looking at? Secondly, because I very much dislike the theory that the gaze is male (more on that later). Thirdly, because I think that the idea that women don't look is inextricably tied up with a lot of other unsavory ideas about women's sexuality, most notably the idea that we don't really have one other than as it relates to keeping men happy.
So, look out for more lust objects on the sideboard. They should make Zan and Scarlet Pervygirl happy at least.
Today's pretty boy is Die, by the way. Plays guitar in Dir en grey. And you know what they say about men with great hands...

And if anyone else wanted to post some pics of their own personal lust objects I personally would rather enjoy that...

Sunday, March 18, 2007

I am now declaring the next week celebration of female desire week.

Don't like it? Too bad. This is my blog, and I can declare whatever I damn well please.

So I've been doing some lurking recently, and visited some new-to-me blogs, and I've noticed a few trends that irk me. And what's the point of having a blog if you can't use it to vent? So, ventage coming right up...

I'm seeing a lot of woman-as-passive, man-as-active talk about sex, and I don't like it. I don't like it a bit. And what REALLY irks me is that a lot of it is coming from women who identify as feminists.

See, here's the problem. I'm a dom. I don't do passive. Well, I do SOMEWHAT passive by my standards (which are not the same as most people's) on occasion, when I happen to be in the mood, but as a general rule? No.

According to a lot of people I apparently do not exist. You can see how this might be vexing.

Now when I see this from ye olde mainstream culture I'm not too surprised. I still don't like it, but it's not surprising. I think that the fact that most cultures encourage this view is extremely damaging to women, and to men too in the long run if only most of them had the intelligence to realise it. Who would you expect to be at the forefront of fighting this view? I would say feminists. But such is often not the case.

For the record, I think that the idea that women are sexually passive, which is inextricable tied up with the concept of womanhood as representing purity, is one of the worst things that has ever happened to women. It's been used to shut us up, to keep us secluded, to bar us from participation in public life. All in all not a good thing. It's also been used to justify rape, because if women naturally don't want sex anyway but can be persuaded to do it if they really love the guy, or if they feel obligated...

So when I see invocations of womanhood as some kind of mystically cleansing force, as a counterweight to the supposed beastliness of men, my bullshit detector starts ringing. And ringing and ringing and ringing.

And the worst thing is that that idea is EVERYWHERE. It's in every major religion, it's in every culture that I know of. In some religions and in many cultures it somehow coexists with the idea of women as dirty and base, as tied to nature in unseemly ways, which for me only proves once more that religion's primary purpose is to melt people's brains so thoroughly that any capacity for logical thought is extinguished.

As illogical as it may seem to position women as both pure and debased, in reality I think both ideas come from the same basis. They come from the idea that the body and the soul are fundamentally separate, and that one is better than the other. It's dualism - mind versus body. flesh versus spirit. And I don't buy it.

People are flesh. We're animals. Animals with big brains and nifty opposable thumbs, yes, but animals nonetheless.

This is not a man thing (note, my radfem friends, it really isn't). It's not a woman thing either. It's a people thing.

What's so terrible about admitting that we're flesh? About dumping the whole idea of purity versus corruption altogether?

It's not just feminists who do this, or just conservatives, it's EVERYONE. And I'm sick of it.
There is no idea in the history of the human race that has done more harm to women than this one. Wherever women are positioned on the scale of purity versus corruption, the one thing that never changes is the fact that it's used to hurt us.

This is why it vexes me when I see the idea of women are pure, morally upright creatures (as opposed to those nasty brutish men) being used as a reason why feminism is justified. It's playing right into the hands of people who want to hurt us. It's not some brilliant new idea that someone came up with in the sixties, no matter what the more hippie-inclined might think. It's a very, very old idea. And it's a very, very bad one.

Lust is not a male thing. It's an animal thing. And women are animals, just as much as men are. When we deny that, we deny a part of our humanity. Why the hell does anyone think that's a good idea?

The justification for feminism shouldn't be that we're better or purer than men. It should be that we're people. No more, no less.

And as for the men who cling like limpets to this idea, that you're the ones who hold all the cards and women have no libidos of their own, that they are the choosers but not the doers...sorry, but no. You think we're not looking at you and assessing you just the same way you are doing to us? Guess again, sunshine. I could make you a list right now of every man I know, and each and every one has a little mental check or cross next to their name indicating fuckable or unfuckable. I may never act on it, but it's there. And the more you cling to the idea of women as passive receptacles the more likely you are to end up in the unfuckable column, because really, who wants to fuck someone who thinks of them as a passive receptacle with no needs of their own? Are you getting that, all you "oh pity the poor shy men who just don't get laid, why do women keep rejecting us, boo hoo" guys? Maybe if you tried approaching them as people rather than as machines that will automatically dole out sex if you just figure out the correct code to enter...

Remember the old feminist adage about the personal being political? Truth starts at home, yes? Well, sex is a big part of the personal for most of us. Yes, ye of the "asexuality is the best way for a feminist to be and all this talk about sex is so trivial and yet we still can't shut up about it" sisterhood, sorry to break it to you, but the vast majority of people are not asexual, and yes that includes women. You want to be that way yourselves? No problem. I'll even go to bat for your right to be that way. But if you could stop attempting to passive-aggressively IMPOSE that way of being on the rest of us and then sneering at anyone who doesn't fit the mold it would be much appreciated. Be a pal and quit with the slut shaming, OK?
(Side note - given that about 90% of the population is heterosexual for most people "political lesbianism" IS in effect asking someone to commit themself to a life of asexuality. Since when is being a feminist like joining a monastic order? As someone who does sleep with women I hate to break it to you, but the real reason to do it is for the muff diving.)

And now I'm off to go wake up Mr Cassandra, who went to bed far too early, the lazy bum. I'm wide awake and horny, time for him to do his job...

Think that makes me a bad feminist? Or a horrible brazen hussy for those of you of the simplistically woman-hating variety?

Kiss my ass.


(PS There will be some actual celebrating later, after I get done with my own personal celebration)

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Newsflash – Male movie director acknowledges that women are people!

So last night I watched Sympathy for Lady Vengeance (often referred to as a more intelligent Kill Bill). I was reluctant to do so, actually, given that I’d already seen one of the movies in vengeance trilogy (Oldboy) and, although I can acknowledge its merit on all kinds of technical movie geek levels I can’t say I actually enjoyed it. For those who may not watch a lot of movies, or at least non-American movies, Korean cinema has been going through an interesting period recently. There have been a spate of shock horror movies and thrillers so bloody and startling and generally violent that they make Reservoir Dogs look like the Telletubbies. Think Saw but with more interesting plots, and far more visceral punches to the gut and sociopolitical content. Oldboy is probably the most disturbing of the lot – the movie culminates with a scene where the lead character cuts out his own tongue in an attempt to persuade his tormentor not to tell the girl who he’s been having a relationship with that she’s actually his daughter (note that he himself didn’t know either until moments before). It’s gruesome on both a physical and an emotional level.
Oldboy was a bit much even for me, and I laughed at the scene in Audition where the girl was poking needles in people’s eyes (it was the sound she was making that set me off). Audition is the movie that famously scared the crap out of Rob Zombie, so let’s just say that my tolerance is pretty high. So, word to the wise – Oldboy is not for everyone. Sympathy for Lady Vengeance, on the other hand, I loved unreservedly, and I think every one of my online buddies should see it.
Here’s why. Good God, the female characters in this movie are actual characters! With emotions and motivations and the ability to both do wonderful things and completely fuck up and everything! It even passes the Mo Movie test! There are actually only four significant male characters in this movie, and about a dozen female characters. And the female lead does (arguably) bad things and gets away with them! The audience is supposed to identify with her, not with any of the men. And yet it’s not The Joy Luck Club – the male characters aren’t stereotyped assholes either. There’s one who’s an absolute monster, one who’s probably the kindest character in the movie, and two who are flawed in normal, predictable ways. The female characters are well drawn and utterly human – even the prostitute is depicted in a sympathetic light, and she’s one of the most vital links in bringing the villain to justice. The movie is also visually stunning – the heroine’s red shoes clicking through the snow, a book of Buddhist sutras that turns out to actually be the design specs for a gun, the gleeful grin on the heroine’s face as she holds up a simple bar of soap used to lay a sexual predator low, the scene where the she sees the five little charms on the villain’s cell phone and realizes what that means, the moment where a group of bereaved relatives are deciding what punishment to inflict upon the villain and the camera pans slowly along wires to show him sitting in a room bound and gagged, forced to listen to every word being said.
I can’t really give an outline without ruining the plot, because there are two McGuffins, one of which even my movie student SO didn’t see coming. Parts of the movie are so gut-wrenching it’s almost physically painful, and other parts are darkly funny. There’s a mother/daughter relationship that will make you cry. The ending is morally complex to say the least, and I’m willing to bet that the audience will be about evenly split in terms of those who think that the punishment meted out to the villain is just and those who will be horrified. That’s why I’m recommending this movie so highly, really – it’s intense and complex and deeply emotionally satisfying. I defy anyone not to identify with the heroine to some degree. Most of all, how often do you see a movie in which the idea that a woman is entitled to seek vengeance when she is wronged is simply taken as a given, in which she is capable of both planning and executing it, and in which despite all of this the audience is not supposed to view her as unnatural and “unfeminine” but as a real person capable of both error and redemption?
Absolutely stunning. Get thee to Netflix and rent this movie ASAP.

Side note – The Wikipedia entry for this movie is truly asinine and completely misses the point the director was trying to make in its haste to babble about cold, cunning women (sigh). Ignore it. It also contains major spoilers.

Update – I checked out some more reviews and holy shit a lot of men missed the point! I keep seeing guys bitching about how the movie sucked because the heroine was such a bad mother (she also kills someone by feeding her bleach, but apparently that’s a far lesser crime), or because she was sometimes cold and didn’t cry when the guys thought she should have, or because OMG the behavior in the woman’s prison was just so nasty! And then there was the guy who complained about the scene where one of the prisoners is forced to go down on another (who then gets her comeuppance in a delightful manner), and didn’t even mention the scene where the villain imposes sex upon his girlfriend in an equally repellant way. Guess men imposing sex on women is just less icky, somehow, or maybe it’s because we see a woman have an orgasm.
Yet another reason why everyone should see this movie – sexist dudes hate it.

Monday, March 12, 2007

Well that was a weird experience…
About a week ago I left my first comment on Dead Men Don’t Rape. I initially avoided that particular blog because the name offends me (not going into what the implications of the title are, but come on, it’s not hard to parse), but then AntiPrincess linked to it and I thought well, if it makes her think, why not at least give it a chance?
So I browsed around a bit. Most of the entries I just didn’t feel engaged with at all, but there was one that I did, so I actually read it in detail.
It was about contemplating throwing away one’s bras and frilly underwear. Now, this idea has always perplexed me – I am a woman who would never under any circumstances discard my bras. This is nothing to do with the feminist implications of wearing or not wearing lingerie, this is because I have big boobs and I’m a fairly active person. I do some sports, I walk a lot and walk very fast – without a bra the bounce factor would be most uncomfortable. My wearing a bra is not a political statement, it’s a necessity for my own comfort. If that meets with anyone’s disapproval…well, sorry about that, but I’m not that fond of walking around in pain. I guess I’m just funny that way.
I’ve never understood the idea that undergarments are inherently patriarchal. I can see why one might come to the conclusion that frilly, lacy, overtly sexy undergarments are so (not that I necessarily disapprove of those either, but that’s another post), but what about your basic, boring cotton panties? What about the sports bra, which in my opinion is the best thing to happen to athletically inclined women since the invention of the sneaker? Are sports bras Tools of the Patriarchy too? Even though mine kind of look like they were designed by the Army Corps of Engineers and are about as sexy as the average military fortification?
This is one of those things that I just don’t seem to be able to grasp no matter how I try. The idea that bras = oppression does seem to be out there floating around, though. I suspect that my questioning that assumption was part of what got my comment deleted at DMDR place.
Please note – I’m not saying that Bea does not have the right to run her blog and moderate her comments any way she sees fit. She does, and my getting the boot is my own fault for not reading her comments policy thoroughly enough first. I’m not a radfem, I’m more of a socialist feminist, therefore I am not welcome. And I can live with that, even though honestly I question the wisdom of making spaces that exclusive – how are any of us every going to accomplish anything if we don’t talk to each other? But, again, her blog, her rules.
The basic idea still puzzles me, though. Where did the concept that bras are inherently a bad thing come from, and do most of us really think it makes any sense? How many of us actually believe that idea? I’m betting a very small minority – I always thought that the bra burning feminist idea was a stupid stereotype with very little basis in reality, brought to you by the same charming individuals who coined the term “feminazi”. I don’t really know what everyone else thinks, though, so I’m throwing it out to the rest of you. Does anyone have any strong opinions about feminine undergarments and their relation to and/or ability to uphold or undermine patriarchy? Is this something that most people think about/care about, or is it pretty much a non-issue?
For me it’s a non-issue. I just don’t see how my altering my choice of undergarments would by some mystical process lead to the fall of patriarchy. To me the whole idea sounds, well, kind of dumb. But that’s just me.
I’m also interested in how this ties in to that unwritten feminist dress code that people always say doesn’t exist. It does exist, though, which becomes obvious each time any feminist is open about violating it. At this point I wish the people who seem to be really, really concerned with what other women wear would just be honest about it, because the “we’re not telling you what to do BUT…” is getting really old.
And on that note, thinking of a recent discussion at PFs place…why are long skirts OK, when short skirts are not? Skirts on women as a whole conforms to a gendered dress code, so why are some skirts frowned upon while others are OK? Is the guideline that anything that might conceivably be attractive to men is verboten? Because to me that seems to be making things all about the men (again), and I’m not sure why as feminists we would want to do that. What if I don’t like long skirts? What if I always feel like I’m drowning in fabric when I wear one? What if they feel restrictive to me? Are all those things less important than what some random guy on the street might think?

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

OK, if we’re going to talk about race…
And hey, look, I get to talk about music too!
Remember those concerts I was babbling about going to a few posts down? Japanese metal/punk/industrial band, Dir en grey, two shows (that I went to – more like 20 shows total), Tempe and San Francisco.
I spotted a pretty clear case of race impacting how people perceive things. During the song Dead Tree (link below if you want to hear it) they were playing an old black and white film on the projection screen at the back of the stage behind the band. The film was footage of the atomic bomb falling on Hiroshima, interspersed with some artsy stuff like falling snow and some footage shot in the city afterwards. All black and white, the newer stuff shot in such a way that you probably wouldn’t have been able to tell the difference between the older film and the newer stuff unless you knew what you were looking at.
Here’s where it gets interesting. The crowd in Tempe was mostly white kids 12-18. The crowd in San Francisco was much more mixed, both racially and in terms of age. I’d say that 30 percent plus of the San Francisco crowd was Asian
When they played the film in Tempe most people didn’t seem to even notice (too busy staring at Toshiya’s ass and Kyo’s abs, I suspect). The few who did notice mostly seemed confused – there were mutterings of “what’s that on the screen? Wow, that’s kind of creepy”. Then there was the Japanese-American guy standing right in front of me, who looked at the screen and froze. I mean that literally – I had one arm looped around his shoulder, and was leaning on his back. The reaction was kind of hard to miss. I couldn’t see his face, but I could certainly feel the tension in his body. And this from a guy who wasn't still for more than a few seconds for the entire rest of the show.
Meanwhile the rest of the kids were completely oblivious.
Now let’s move to San Francisco. I ended up right in the middle of a crowd of Japanese and Korean American kids, with 2 Japanese girls (as in they actually flew over from Japan for the show) right next to me. When they showed the film to that crowd, the reaction was completely different. Obviously I couldn’t see the whole crowd (I was right at the front, I could barely move), but the people around me? Everyone went quiet and just looked at the screen. Apart from the one white girl in the front row, who was obliviously head-banging. The mood was – pensive, kind of sad, more than a little angry. Which was exactly the reaction the footage was intended to provoke, really – I have to admit that I was looking at head-banging girl and thinking “wow, you sure missed the point”.
So there you have it. The people at both venues were about the same age, all were raised in America, presumably exposed to the same curriculum, and yet one group didn’t even recognize what they were seeing while the other group? Every one of those kids knew what they were watching. What does that say about white America? Do we just not teach kids here about what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so that they only know if their parents tell them, or is the privilege so pervasive that it actually limits people’s ability to process what they’re looking at? Or is it just that white kids don’t care because they don’t have to care?
And on another note…damn were the (white, older) security guards at both shows freaked out by the outpouring of teenage hormones directed at the band. I noticed the same phenomenon at the Family Values tour last summer – a bunch of white guys looking disconcerted and more than a little pissed off at the sight of a bunch of white girls gazing in open lust at a group of Japanese men. On all these occasions there were all kinds of hostile, threatened-looking responses from the guys including everything from “don’t see what’s so great about them” muttering to open racism (“But Japanese men are blah blah” – insert standard racist stereotypes) and even a few “huh, I’m gonna beat that guy’s ass, that’ll show him” type comments in Sacramento. Charming. Anyway, it was very clear that a lot of white guys find the prospect of white girls lusting over non-white men a bit perturbing. Not that that’s a surprise, really, but it was interesting. Also interesting in that yep, that’s definitely racism, but it’s a slightly different flavor of racism than that directed at the idea of white women with black men (think the Terrell Owens Towelgate drama). I’m not going to get into the way that white America looks at Asian men (or women) here, because that’s a subject deserving of its own post, but if anyone wants to talk about it in the comments…
So yeah, next person who says that this country isn’t racist and that white privilege doesn’t exist gets smacked in the face with a frying pan.

Links…

Dir en grey – Dead Tree

PS Let's hope the link works, I haven't tried this in Blogger before.

Monday, March 05, 2007

Psst! Heart and Chasing Moksha – It’s the Clue Phone, and it’s ringing just for you!

So I’ve been following the Special White Lady debacle for the last few days, mostly quietly, and as amusing as it is to laugh at habitual ignorance of some of the less self-aware members of my own race there are times when one gets the feeling that they simply are not grasping what is being said to them. There they sit like the proverbial deer in the headlights, blinking stupidly, apparently completely unable to grasp why, jeez, everyone seems to be all upset with them! What did little old them do to deserve such meanness? Well, as a public service from one white girl to another, let me clue you both in.
What people are objecting to isn’t just what you’re saying, it’s the tone in which you’re saying it. Now I know that tone can be hard to interpret on the internet, but in both your cases the stench of martyrdom hangs pretty thickly over everything you write. What most people are taking away from your threads is a general sense that you consider yourselves to have made huge, giant sacrifices by marrying black men, and that you feel that those sacrifices entitle you to both praise and frequent pats on the back.
This is where the problem lies. Firstly, the idea that you made a sacrifice by marrying your husband? Pretty icky all around. Not very flattering to him, does not speak well of how much you value him as a person. Doesn’t speak well of you, either, the fact that you appear to consider yourselves above an entire category of human beings.
And there’s the other thing. That idea that you “married down” that permeates everything you write? Pretty racist, honestly. Likely to cause offense in most people of the thinking variety. Guaranteed to push the piss off buttons of most people of color, and for good reason.
And then there’s your whole “I speak for my husband” business, Chasing Moksha. Is the man not capable of speaking for himself? Has it ever occurred to you that your claim to speak for him might be met with just a teensy bit of skepticism from most black people, who are entirely too used to other people claiming to speak for them? Ever heard the term “cultural appropriation”? You’re pretty much the poster child.
And as to the claim that you deeply understand racism just because you’re partnered with a person of color…listen, ladies, my husband is Asian (whoops, better whisper that around CM, we all know how she feels about Asian people). Does my marriage to him give me some kind of magical ability to understand what it feels like to be the victim of racism? Umm, no. Not even a little bit. I can lend him an ear to listen or a shoulder to cry on when he needs it, be his sounding board or the person he rants to when he’s pissed, but will I ever really understand what it feels like to walk in his shoes? No. And neither will either of you.
And you know what bothers me, personally, the most about all your self-absorbed little rants? How many times in all of this kerfuffle have either of you ever said that you love the guy you married? OK, after we count those, how many references to your own sacrifices have you made? Put the two side by side…how’s that tally looking? And how does that make your partner/former partner feel, the idea that you value him more as a status symbol than a person?
Me, personally? I made no sacrifices by marrying my husband. He’s a great guy, and I’m lucky to have him. Now if only either of you could pull your heads out of your asses for long enough, maybe you might find yourself looking at your partner the same way…

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Randomness...I just signed up for MySpace (yeah, way behind on that one, I know). Anyone else around here on there? If so pay me a visit, yeah? I'm still trying to figure out how to use the damn thing...
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=162816456

Friday, March 02, 2007

The elephant in the room, or, what’s missing from the feminist conversation about porn and sex work

Class. Can we talk about that for a minute? I know that America likes to think of itself as a classless society but…um, no. Just because your aristocracy don’t have titles or distinctive accents (and even that last part is debatable) doesn’t mean that they don’t exist.
In reality the USA has pretty much the same basic class breakdown as every other society. The percentages in each class level vary a bit from one society to another, but the essential structure remains that same. So, how does this apply to porn?
In my experience the vast majority of the people who do any kind of sex work are working class. I do not mean this as an insult – I’m a socialist, working class is not scornful term to me. What I mean is that I have met many women who do some kind of sex work over the years, and I have yet to meet one who was from any kind of a background that could be described as truly privileged. I’m sure there are a few, mind, but I’ve never met one. A few middle class girls, yes, but no one truly upper crust. No, Paris Hilton does not count just because she made a sex tape. That’s not work, that’s a rich kid having a laugh. I’m talking about people for whom sex work is how they pay the rent.
This fact seems to be completely missing from most of the discussions I’ve ever seen about sex work within the feminist world. Part of that I think is that Americans tend to dominate the conversation, and many Americans are still basking in the illusion that they live in a classless society. Not the case – America right now has about as much social mobility as it did in the 1920s, if not less. Most people end up on the same rung of the ladder they were born on, and most significant wealth is inherited. Social mobility is possible, yes, but it’s the exception rather than the rule.
The other reason is the radfem idea that gender is the most significant of all things in term of how human societies are divided, summed up in the phrase “sex class”. If women are the sex class, and that’s the primary division in society, then why even bother talking about that other kind of class, the one that affects what school you go to and what food you eat and what kind of house you live in and all those other things which impact where you end up in life?
The problem is that those things count. They count a lot, actually, especially when it comes to educational and employment opportunities. Trust me, I’ve spent a good part of my working life in and around America’s elite, and let me tell you right now that they are not interested in hiring, promoting or even socializing with people who are working class. At one company I was the only non Ivy graduate there, and that’s only because I went to university in the UK. Class has a huge impact on what job opportunities are open to a person in this country.
So, back to sex work. It’s mostly done by people who grew up working class. This is important to acknowledge if we’re going to talk about it, so why is class the elephant in the room in this discussion, and why do so many feminists seem to not even notice that the elephant is standing right in front of them?
Let my throw my own story into the ring. I was a pretty privileged kid. Several members of the British royal family went to my boarding school. We also produced the first female Wimbledon champion (pretty upper crust sport, tennis). My high school was as elitist as it gets. I spent my teens in a nice, safe, clean little upper class bubble, and if my Dad hadn’t been stationed in the Third World for most of my childhood I’d probably be as utterly clueless about how the world really works as most of my former classmates still are.
Then I moved to London. I deliberately cut most of my ties with my former classmates, mostly because I wasn’t very happy about living in the bubble. I was bored, and the idea of sealing myself up in yet another bubble (some of my former teachers are probably still fuming that I refused to apply to Oxford) did not appeal to me at all.
When I got to London I began to move in entirely different circles. I’m a music nut, punk, metal and industrial mostly, so that became my peer group, other people who were into the same music. I still somehow managed to end up with a long term boyfriend who was as thoroughly privileged as I was, funnily enough – you can take the kid out of the bubble but you can’t take the bubble out of the kid, I suppose. For the first time I met a lot of people who actually had to work for a living, who couldn’t rely on Dad to pay the rent and bail them out whenever they got into trouble, and that’s when I first started to encounter the sex industry up close and personal.
There was a group of girls who all did sex work of one kind or another. The Italian girl was a stripper, the London native worked as a barker in a strip club and occasional hooker, the girl from the north of England worked as an escort. They didn’t like me very much, given that one of their friends had been dating a guy very much adored within our little scene who dumped her as soon as he met me – ah, the dramas surrounding boys who are in bands that the girls get unwittingly pulled into. Kind of funny in retrospect since his band sucked and he was a lousy lay, but anyway…suffice to say that I was not popular with these girls. One of them once tried to stab me in the throat with a broken beer bottle, again because of the “boyfriend stealing” thing (amusing since he chased me, not the other way around). That was my first impression of people who worked in the sex industry, and it wasn’t a very good one. The Italian girl I actually kind of liked at first, but then the whole guy drama happened and of course we had to be enemies. Teenage logic at it’s finest.
But then there was Noriko. Noriko was a dominatrix. She actually had a day job in a restaurant for visa purposes, a good thing given that her parents had essentially disowned her and would probably have turned her in to immigration if given the chance. She provided the first revelation for me – she didn’t actually have sex with any of her clients. The idea that people would willingly pay just for the domination and humiliation was a little surprising. I actually hung out and watched a couple of her sessions when we first met, because I was curious and she liked having an audience. She was also, and still remains, the sexiest woman I have ever met. Long dyed orangey red hair down to her ass, ripped fishnets, denim short shorts, big motorcycle boots…sexy punk girl at it’s finest. Anyone looking for something on which to blame my abiding interest in Japanese pop culture can blame her. She was also an awesome human being who introduced me to new music and new people, taught me how to cook Japanese mommy food (which I still do), and took care of me like a big sister. I loved her dearly, and still regret losing touch with her when I moved to San Francisco and she moved to Tokyo.
So there you have my introduction to the sex industry. One set of people that I met were, well, hugely fucked up. The London girl and the Italian were both hooked on heroin, and the girl from the north of England drank more than any other person I have ever met. I know that the Italian girl was an abused child, because she sobbed her story out on my shoulder late one night in a club before it was decided by the rest of her group that she and I needed to be enemies. Basically they fit the negative stereotype that most people have of women in the sex industry perfectly.
And then there was Noriko, and the friends who she occasionally worked with. Part of the difference may have been cultural – they were all Japanese, and blessedly free of the weird Christian hang-ups about sex to which the other group were prone (all three of the others were raised Catholic, interestingly enough). They were also all from a rather higher class background and a whole lot more educated. Part of the difference may have been the client base they worked with – mostly Japanese businessmen who were in town regularly for work, a few who were stationed in London more permanently, most of them married to women who for whatever reason they didn’t want to share their interest in all things fetishy with. Pretty much all of the clients were steady and long-term, and all seemed to be vetted by their boss fairly thoroughly.
The first group horrified, frightened and repelled me. The second…I worried about them occasionally, but they all seemed to be smart women who knew what they were doing and none of them seemed to have been coerced or forced by addiction or some other unfortunate circumstance into their profession. It wouldn’t have been my choice, but I was able to acknowledge that it was their choice to make.
I had my own encounters with the industry, too. I met Noriko’s boss a few times, and she kept trying to recruit me to work for her. She seemed to think that I would have been quite the hit with the clientele, and she was probably right – I’m a petite, pretty woman with soft, feminine features and big boobs, not to mention perfect boarding school inculcated manners, plus I’m one of the rare Western women who’s smaller than most Japanese men. I never for a second considered accepting, though, in fact I was rather offended that she even asked, and here’s where the class factor comes in.
Firstly, for most women of my class the very idea of sex work is unthinkable. It’s easy to pretend that that’s a moral reflex, but I don’t think that’s the case. Really I think it’s all about the class. Sex work is something that those other women do, the ones without the perfect manners and the useless but socially valued skills (horseback riding, piano playing, ballroom dancing, fencing, archery – seriously, who really needs to know how to fence?). It’s déclassé. That was what was going through my mind every time Noriko’s boss talked to me. It was most definitely what was behind my instinctively sneering response to the other group. Funny that it took me years to even realize how obvious my sneering must have been, and that that might have been part of the reason why they resented me so much.
There was also this guy who I ran into all the time who was a photographer. I didn’t know exactly what kind of photography he did at first, although I really should have figured it out sooner given how young he was and what an expensive neighborhood he lived in. At one point I was looking for a new place to live because I hated my landlord, and that’s when he made his move. He offered to let me share his apartment cum studio (gorgeous by the way – I had been there once for an after-party) and pay no rent at all. All I would have had to do was one modeling session a month, a couple of hours maybe. I sat there in shock as he laid it out for me – it was soft-core stuff that he did, pretty stuff, no penetration, just pictures of beautiful girls.
I slapped him, threw my drink in his face and stomped off in a huff. The next few months were weird, because I saw the guy around all the time and he kept trying to talk to me but I wasn’t having it, and of course there was Noriko to the rescue with her perfect punk snarl and her big stompy boots (anyone who thinks all Japanese girls are of the shy and cutesy variety is smoking crack – that girl could have kicked the ass of most men I know).
At the time I was hugely offended and frankly horrified that anyone would say such things to me. Nice, well-raised, steady boyfriend having, upper middle class me. It felt like a judgment, as if I had been called slutty, and it upset me.
A few more years of actual life experience and I see things differently. The fact that I don’t look “slutty”, that I look soft and pretty and girly, is precisely why he was interested in me. His mistake was in assuming that because I was hanging out with Noriko I was open to the idea of working in the industry, which I wasn’t. I also see the really important thing that I didn’t see then – it was laughably easy for me to walk away from that offer, because I could always rely on Dad to pay the bills and keep me out of trouble. Not everyone has that option. It was easy for me to stand on my morals and bathe in my offended feminine virtue, because I was also bathing in class privilege. Refusing that offer had no negative impact on my standard of living whatsoever. It wasn’t a difficult choice, it didn’t hurt me – but what about someone less economically fortunate? What about someone like the Italian girl, who was an illegal immigrant who couldn’t get legitimate work and whose family wouldn’t lift a finger to support her? What would the same offer have looked like from her perspective? And how much of my horrified reaction was based precisely on my outrage that anyone could possibly think I might be “someone like her”?
I really think that that’s what’s behind some of the more virulent hatred directed at women who do sex work by other women, even when those women are feminists. There’s a fear of being tainted by association, of being judged. It’s the Good Girls versus the Bad Girls all over again. It’s kind of pathetic, really – you would think that those of us who identify as feminists would be too smart to buy into that kind of thinking, but that does not seem to be the case. What’s going on is othering – “I’m not like her. She’s a slut, I’m not. God forbid that people think I’m like her”.
So, that’s what I think is really going on. The Good Girls versus the Bad Girls. Sex and class. The ways these things intertwine, how important it is to all of us that other people see us the way we see ourselves. We seem to be forgetting the sisterhood part, and that’s a sad thing, because if we other people and refuse to see women as sisters just because we don’t like what they do for a living then what does that say about what kind of people we are? About our capacity for empathy, or compassion? About our ability to accept that other people are always going to make choices different from our own?
There’s a really old British saying, from a folk song. “Rosy O’Grady and the Captain’s lady are sisters under the skin”. We all seem to have forgotten that recently, and I think it’s time we all remembered.
And on a small, personal note…damn I miss Noriko. Wherever she is and whatever she’s doing now, I hope she’s happy.